<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Berthier vs Lebelle</title>
        <link>http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/topic/32046/t/Berthier-vs-Lebelle.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ 
  I know the physical differences between the Berthier and the Lebelle,but what are the historic differences?
  
  The French were the first to introduce the use of smokeless powder. I was wondering in which rifle did they introduce it .
  
  Were both rifles used in the First world war or did one predate the other?
  
  I like to collect technologically significant arms but am less informed on the French arms.
  
  I believe the differences in magazine capacity had to do with which service... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:36:21 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:12:57 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Berthier vs Lebelle ]]></title>
			<link>http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/reply/186676/t/Berthier-vs-Lebelle.html#reply-186676</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Isn&#39;t it amazing the amount of inormation &quot;1886Lebel&quot; is able to share ?  I am always truly humbled. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Alexei)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/sreply/186676</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:12:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Berthier vs Lebelle ]]></title>
			<link>http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/reply/186648/t/Berthier-vs-Lebelle.html#reply-186648</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div>
  Thank you for the great replies, obviously I am speaking with scholars.
  <br>
  Nick
</div> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (fiatmom)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/sreply/186648</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Berthier vs Lebelle ]]></title>
			<link>http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/reply/186623/t/Berthier-vs-Lebelle.html#reply-186623</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Patrick,
<br>
<br>
Nice posts my friend.
<br>
<br>
Eric ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (eb in oregon)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/sreply/186623</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:40:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Berthier vs Lebelle ]]></title>
			<link>http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/reply/186603/t/Berthier-vs-Lebelle.html#reply-186603</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Let me get some things from this thread straight ...
<br>
1. To keep the conservative old generals happy, the Berthiers originally had three round clips to enforce ammo conservation ... FALSE ... Berthiers were
originally made for Cavalry troops and as had been said before their main weapons were the lance, sabre and pistol.
<br>
2. It is my understanding that the Berthier was originally designed for a different cartridge which enabled 5 rounds, and when adapted to 8mm Lebel it would
only... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (1886lebel)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/sreply/186603</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:41:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Berthier vs Lebelle ]]></title>
			<link>http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/reply/186572/t/Berthier-vs-Lebelle.html#reply-186572</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 1886lebel, thanks for that detailed reply.   I think that post should be permanently posted in the French firearms information thread.   
<br>
<br>
From reading your post it seems that two factors influenced the French to adopt the Berthier carbines in 1890 with three shot magazines.   The first reason was
that they didn&#39;t want a magazine protruding out of the carbine that could be vulnerable to damage and would tear the soldiers&#39; uniform jackets while it
was slung across the back.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (eagle7)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/sreply/186572</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:43:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Berthier vs Lebelle ]]></title>
			<link>http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/reply/186551/t/Berthier-vs-Lebelle.html#reply-186551</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Berthier Carabine, Mousqueton et Fusil Histoire
<br>
<br>
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">1887</span> - The <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Comité de L&#39;Artillerie</span> headed by Général Gallifet decided to
experiment in making a carbine version of the <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"><span style="COLOR: #0000ff">Fusil d&#39;Infanterie Modèle 1886
&quot;Lebel&quot;</span></span> with the following requirements: It had to use the same cartridge already in service, <span... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (1886lebel)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/sreply/186551</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:11:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Berthier vs Lebelle ]]></title>
			<link>http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/reply/186543/t/Berthier-vs-Lebelle.html#reply-186543</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Also remember that our accepted concepts of clip loading and magazines were brand new back and based on theory rather than experience-cf. how our Krag and
M1903 still had cutoffs, the idea being that the soldier would use his weapon as a single shot and keep the magazine in reserve for emergencies-repelling a
charge, e.g. The Lebel has a cutoff.  I recall reading that
<br>
at the Battle of Concon in the Chilean Civil War of 1891 it was found that the tubular magazine rifles used (not sure of... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (7GREEN)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/sreply/186543</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:46:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Berthier vs Lebelle ]]></title>
			<link>http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/reply/186536/t/Berthier-vs-Lebelle.html#reply-186536</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Actually the Foreign Legion preferred the Lebel to the Berthier, according to one of my references. They believed that the Lebel was more accurate and more
durable. The Legion went back to Lebels after WWI.   I did some checking, and one reason for the three round magazine of the Berthier was because it was
originally adopted as a cavalry weapon. Supposedly, the French found that the Lebel tubular magazine design was not easily adaptable to a carbine length
weapon, so they developed the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (eagle7)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/sreply/186536</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:44:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Berthier vs Lebelle ]]></title>
			<link>http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/reply/186533/t/Berthier-vs-Lebelle.html#reply-186533</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ So the Lebelle is older, and the first smokeless rifle . I was told that the french would not give the forign leagon more cartridges than the army, thus the
three round magazine. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (fiatmom)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/sreply/186533</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:19:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Berthier vs Lebelle ]]></title>
			<link>http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/reply/186531/t/Berthier-vs-Lebelle.html#reply-186531</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It is my understanding that the Berthier was originally designed for a different cartridge which enabled 5 rounds, and when adapted to 8mm Lebel it would only
take 3 rounds because of the rim.
<br>
<br>
At least that was reported in an issue of the American Rifleman some time ago.
<br>
<br>
Eric ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (eb in oregon)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/sreply/186531</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:06:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Berthier vs Lebelle ]]></title>
			<link>http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/reply/186529/t/Berthier-vs-Lebelle.html#reply-186529</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ IIRC, it was all about the battle rifle arms race in the 1870 - 1900 era. The Berthier&#39;s box magazine and mannlicher clips were technologically comparable
to most of the battle rifles of the early 1890s. The Lebel&#39;s tubular magazine was old fashioned black powder cartridge technology of the late 1870s shared
with the Winchester lever rifles, Swiss Vetterli, Mauser Model 1871, Kropatchek, etc. France and Germany were rivals, and a technological advance by one nation
would trigger a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (eagle7)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/sreply/186529</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:56:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Berthier vs Lebelle ]]></title>
			<link>http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/topic/32046/t/Berthier-vs-Lebelle.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div>
  <font size="2"><font size="3">I know the physical differences between the Berthier and the Lebelle,but what are the historic differences?
  <br>
  The French were the first to introduce the use of smokeless powder. I was wondering in which rifle did they introduce it .
  <br>
  Were both rifles used in the First world war or did one predate the other?
  <br>
  I like to collect technologically significant arms but am less informed on the French arms.
  <br>
  I believe the differences... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (fiatmom)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://parallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforums.yuku.com/topic/32046</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:36:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>